Frequent question: Is it possible for there to be more carnivores than herbivores in an ecosystem?

Answer and Explanation: Every time we move up a trophic level in an ecosystem, most of the energy is lost and not used to increase the total biological mass of the next trophic level. … Hence, there can never be more carnivores than herbivores in an ecosystem, by mass, as too much energy is lost at each trophic level.

Can there be an ecosystem with only carnivores?

No. It is how it is because every living thing has to have a source of energy. For plants, the source of energy is the sun and they use it to make food for themselves so they can grow and live. For herbivores, the source of energy is gained by eating plants which provide them with the food the plant made for itself.

THIS IS IMPORTANT:  Your question: Why wildlife is in danger today?

Can an ecosystem have a carnivore but no herbivores?

So, in answer to our question, although there would be drastic changes in biodiversity of an ecosystem, the food chain would survive without herbivores and carnivores. However, the reverse is not true. Producers are essential to the ecosystem, providing food for everyone else.

What would happen if there were more carnivores than herbivores in an ecosystem?

Answer: The carnivores keep the populations of other carnivores and herbivores in check. If there were no carnivores, the herbivore populations would explode and they will rapidly consume large amounts of plants and fungi, growing until there is not enough food to sustain them.

Are there more herbivores than carnivores in a food chain?

There are also more herbivores than carnivores. A healthy food web has many autotrophs, many herbivores and few carnivores and omnivores. The biomass of an ecosystem depends on how balanced and connected its food web is.

Why are there many more herbivores than large predators in ecosystems?

There are more herbivores than carnivores because all life depends on primary producers: plants. Herbivores can eat plants, carnivores can’t. Enough herbivores must survive to breed and produce replacements. …

What would happen if there were no herbivores?

(i) Herbivores act as a food source for the carnivores. If the herbivores are removed from the ecosystem, there will be no food for carnivores which are dependent on herbivores for their survival. As a result, the population of carnivores will also start dwindling. This will lead to ecological instability.

What would happen if all decomposers died?

If decomposers were removed from a food chain, there would be a break down in the flow of matter and energy. Waste and dead organisms would pile up. Producers would not have enough nutrients because, within the waste and dead organisms, nutrients would not be released back into the ecosystem.

THIS IS IMPORTANT:  Are glue sticks recyclable?

What will happen if all animals become herbivores?

If all animal were herbivorous, the food chain won’t evolve, the ecological balance gets disturbed, which stops ecological succession, and to sum it all, the ecology will vanish straight away.

What would happen if all the omnivores became carnivores?

MATE ! IF ALL THE OMNIVORES BECOME CARNIVORES THAN NO ANIMAL LEFT IN OUR EARTH BECAUSE EVERYONE EAT THEM AND AFTER ANIMAL PEOPLE START EATING HUMAN BEING AND SOME TIME THEY ALSO EAT THEIR OWN BODY PART BECAUSE HUNGER IS A VERY BIG PROBLEM !

What would happen if there were no carnivores on earth?

Answer: The carnivores keep the populations of other carnivores and herbivores in check. If there were no carnivores, the herbivore populations would explode and they will rapidly consume large amounts of plants and fungi, growing until there is not enough food to sustain them.

What is the 10 rule?

On average, only about 10 percent of energy stored as biomass in a trophic level is passed from one level to the next. This is known as “the 10 percent rule” and it limits the number of trophic levels an ecosystem can support. … This is how energy flows from one trophic level to the next.

What will happen if the number of carnivores become more than the number of herbivores?

Answer: This will create an imbalance in the food chain resulting in the reduction in population of herbivores as carnivores would feed on them and increasing the population of producers as there will be less herbivores to feed on plants.

THIS IS IMPORTANT:  Does climate vary with longitude?

Why are herbivores fossils more common than carnivores?

Since herbivores were often eaten by other dinosaurs, their bones were often taken away from were the majority of the body lay to rest. This means that there are many incomplete herbivore fossils. There are more larger herbivores than carnivores.

Are there more herbivores or carnivores dinosaurs?

Most dinosaurs were plant-eaters (herbivores) about 65% of them. Some dinosaurs were meat-eaters (carnivores). Dinosaurs had many different distinguishing features that you can read more about when reading facts on each dinosaur.

Do carnivores have more energy than herbivores?

Carnivores are at a higher trophic level than Herbivores, and producers (plants) are at a lower trophic level than Herbivores. At each successive trophic level, only 10% of the energy is passed.